Capps v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 5

CLERK'S JUDGMENT Dismissing Case with Prejudice Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/16/2014. (cds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF MDL No. 2100 This Document Relates To: Samantha Bagwell v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:10-cv-20172-DRH-PMF Brittany Buck v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:12-cv-11296-DRH-PMF Doris Capps v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:13-cv-10605-DRH-PMF Cindy A. Cupp v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:12-cv-11295-DRH-PMF Beth Eyestone, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:13-cv-10557-DRH-PMF Sandi Fisher v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:12-cv-11346-DRH-PMF Pamela Fowler, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:13-cv-10603-DRH-PMF Shana N. Vetter, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:11-cv-20155-DRH-PMF Trine Merritt Vik v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:13-cv-10628-DRH-PMF Kari Vozar v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:13-cv-10635-DRH-PMF Sally K. Wheeler, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:10-cv-20324-DRH-PMF Kyle L. White v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:12-cv-11321-DRH-PMF Nicole Marie Wilder, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:10-cv-12165-DRH-PMF Tiffany J. Williams, et al. v. Bayer Corporation, et al. No. 3:11-cv-12995-DRH-PMF JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. purpose of docket control. These matters are before the Court for the IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal filed on December 16, 2014, the above captioned cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK OF COURT BY: /s/Cheryl A. Ritter Deputy Clerk Dated: December 16, 2014 Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.12.16 12:30:14 -06'00' APPROVED: U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE U. S. DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?