Ougle v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
Filing
27
ORDER, DENYING 25 MOTION Motion for Expedited Hearing or, in the alternative, for stay of the October 8, 2015 Order, 23 MOTION for permission to inspect Master Settlement Agreement and filings with the Claims Administrator on behalf of Anth ony Ougel, Sr. and MOTION for Extension of Time to file a notice with the Court stating whether Movants are asserting Mr. Ougle's signature on the release is not authentic. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/14/2015. (dsw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
______________________________________________________________________________
IN RE PRADAXA
)
MDL No. 2385
(DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE) )
3:12-md-02385-DRH-SCW
PRODUCTS LIABILITY
)
Judge David R. Herndon
LITIGATION
)
______________________________________________________________________________
This Document Relates to:
Anthony Ougle v. Boehringer Ingelheim
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., No. 3:13-cv-60030DRH-SCW
ORDER
HERNDON, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Motion for
Permission To Inspect Master Settlement Agreement And Filings With The Claims
Administrator On Behalf Of Their Deceased Father, Anthony Ougle, Sr. And For
Extension Of Time To File A Notice With The Court Stating Whether Or Not
Movants Are Asserting Mr. Ougle’s Signature On The Release Is Not Authentic
(Doc. 23); and (2) Motion for Expedited Hearing (Doc. 25). Defendant, Boehringer
Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BIPI”) has responded (Doc. 26).
Movants’ motions seek to relitigate matters already decided by the Court.
The Court agrees with BIPI, the Court has already considered and ruled on
Movants’ arguments. The Court will not further prolong this case while movants
decide whether to accept the settlement money or contest the Release as a forgery.
As previously explained, the settlement in this case is final. Movants’ request to
intervene will be denied absent notification that the Movants intend to contest the
Page 1 of 2
Release as a forgery through an evidentiary hearing before this Court (Doc. 21).
Movants have until October 16, 2015 to inform their Court as to their position on
contesting the signature on the Release (Doc. 21).
The present motions (Doc. 23 and Doc. 25) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 14th day of October, 2015.
Digitally signed
by David R.
Herndon
Date: 2015.10.14
11:22:49 -05'00'
United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?