Gates v. Lane et al
Filing
102
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants C/O Bathon, C/O Flatt, C/O Harbison, C/O Hicks, C/O Homoya against Plaintiff Marcus Gates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 2/28/17. (amv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
MARCUS GATES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARY LANE, BRYCE HICKS, DEREK
FLATT,DAVID HOMOYA, CORY
HARBISON and KEVIN BATHON,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.
13-768-SCW
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant Mary Lane was dismissed without prejudice on November 5, 2014, by an
Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 46).
Defendant Bryce Hicks was granted judgment as a matter of law on February 28,
2017 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 95).
The remaining issues came before this Court for jury trial.
The issues have been
tried and the jury has rendered its verdict (Doc. 100) in favor of Defendants Derek Flatt,
David Homoya, Cory Harbison and Kevin Bathon and against Plaintiff, Marcus Gates.
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants BRYCE HICKS, DEREK
FLATT, DAVID HOMOYA, CORY HARBISON and KEVIN BATHON and against Plaintiff
MARCUS GATES.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule
59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court.
These deadlines for motions under
The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30
days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal.
extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 28th day of February, 2017
This period can only be
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by
/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?