Gates v. Lane et al

Filing 102

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants C/O Bathon, C/O Flatt, C/O Harbison, C/O Hicks, C/O Homoya against Plaintiff Marcus Gates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 2/28/17. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARCUS GATES, Plaintiff, vs. MARY LANE, BRYCE HICKS, DEREK FLATT,DAVID HOMOYA, CORY HARBISON and KEVIN BATHON, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 13-768-SCW JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendant Mary Lane was dismissed without prejudice on November 5, 2014, by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 46). Defendant Bryce Hicks was granted judgment as a matter of law on February 28, 2017 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 95). The remaining issues came before this Court for jury trial. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict (Doc. 100) in favor of Defendants Derek Flatt, David Homoya, Cory Harbison and Kevin Bathon and against Plaintiff, Marcus Gates. THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants BRYCE HICKS, DEREK FLATT, DAVID HOMOYA, CORY HARBISON and KEVIN BATHON and against Plaintiff MARCUS GATES. Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action. The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. These deadlines for motions under The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown. DATED this 28th day of February, 2017 This period can only be JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald Deputy Clerk Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?