Whitehead v. Harrington

Filing 99

JUDGMENT in favor of Richard Harrington against Carl Whitehead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 9/27/2017. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CARL WHITEHEAD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD HARRINGTON, Defendant(s). CASE NO. 14-468-SCW JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE This case came before this court for jury trial. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict (Doc. 96) in favor of Defendant Richard Harrington and against Plaintiff, Carl Whitehead. THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants RICHARD HARRINGTON and against Plaintiff CARL WHITEHEAD. Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action. The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. These deadlines for motions under The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown. DATED this 27th day of September, 2017 Page 1 of 2 This period can only be JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald Deputy Clerk Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?