Hines v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT in favor of Illinois Department of Corrections, CFSS Harris, CFSS Reiman, CFSS Snyder, Rick Sutton, S A Godinez, Terri Bryant against Montorio C Hines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 7/2/2018. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MONTORIO C. HINES, Plaintiff, vs. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S.A. GODINEZ, RICK SUTTON, TERRI BRYANT, CFSS HARRIS, CFSS SNYDER, and CFSS REIMAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 14-529-SCW Defendant(s). JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendants Rick Sutton, CFSS Harris, CFSS Snyder, and CFSS Reiman were granted summary judgment on January 31, 2017 by and Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 65). Defendant S.A. Godinez was dismissed with prejudice on November 21, 2017 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 91). The remaining case is dismissed with prejudice and without costs in accordance with an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on December 11, 2017 (Doc. 98). THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Illinois Department of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Rick Sutton, Terri Bryant, CFSS Harris, CFSS Snyder, and CFSS Reiman and against Plaintiff Montorio C. Hines. The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. These deadlines for motions under The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown. DATED this 2nd day of July, 2018 This period can only be JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald Deputy Clerk Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?