Palafox v. Unknown Parties
Filing
108
JUDGMENT in favor of Unknown Parties, Warden of Pinckneyville Correctional Center, Joyce Lucas, Ryan Hammonds against Anastacio B Palafox. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 3/31/17. (amv)
WIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ANASTACIO B. PALAFOX.
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Nurse Jane Doe and
Officer John Doe, WARDEN OF
PINCKNEYVILLE CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, JOYCE LUCAS and RYAN
HAMMONDS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.
14-543-SCW
Defendant(s).
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant Unknown parties, Nurse Jane Doe and Officer John Doe were dismissed
by the filing of the Amended Complaint and Corrected Amended Complaint (Docs.18 and
21).
Defendant Warden of Pinckneyville Correctional Center was dismissed by the filing
of the Amended Complaint on 2/22/16 (Doc. 72).
Defendants Joyce Lucas and Ryan Hammonds were granted summary judgment and
dismissed with prejudice on 3/31/17 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C.
Williams (Doc 107).
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants UNKNOWN PARTIES,
Nurse Jane Doe and Officer John Doe, WARDEN OF PINCKNEYVILLE
CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JOYNCE LUCAS and RYAN HAMMONS and against
Plaintiff ANASTACIO B. PALAFOX.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action.
.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule
59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court.
These deadlines for motions under
The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30
days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal.
extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 31st day of March, 2017
This period can only be
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by
/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?