Robert L. Meinders, D.C., LTD v. Unitedhealthcare, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying 23 Motion to Strike and denying 23 Motion for Leave to File. Further, the Court STRIKES the sur-reply contained in the motion. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/3/14. (klh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DR. ROBERT L. MEINDERS. D.C. LTD., Individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons, Plaintiff, v. No. 14-0548-DRH UNITEDHEALTHCARE, INC., UNITEDHEATLHCARE OF ILLINOIS, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-12 Defendants. ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge: Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ reply brief or in the alternative for leave to file the within sur-reply thereto, instanter (Doc. 23). Defendants oppose the motion (Doc. 27). Based on the following, the Court denies the motion and strikes the sur-reply. Plaintiffs argue that defendants’ reply brief improperly raises a new legal theory and factual basis for dismissal. Defendants contend that plaintiffs’ motion is an attempt to file a sur-reply in violation of the Local Rules and that the motion is ill-founded on the merits. Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: “Reply briefs are not favored and should be filed in only exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief shall state the exceptional circumstances. Under no circumstances will sur-reply briefs be accepted.” Here, the reply brief states that exceptional circumstances are present as Page 1 of 2 plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition raises a new issue that was not addressed in defendants’ motion and ignores relevant law and facts relating to that issue. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and finds that defendants’ reply brief is an appropriate reply brief contemplated by the Local Rules. Thus, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ reply brief or in the alternative for leave to file the within sur-reply thereto, instanter (Doc. 23) and STRIKES the sur-reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 3rd day of September, 2014. Digitally signed by David R. Herndon Date: 2014.09.03 13:30:32 -05'00' Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?