Valenti v. Godinez et al

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 11 ) andDENIES Valentis request for a temporary restraining order contained in his complaint (Doc. 1 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/30/2014. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
RAYMOND VALENTI,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 14-cv-673-JPG-PMF

vs.
RANDY GROUNDS, SUSAN KERR, DOCTOR
WILLIAMS, and DOCTOR SHAH,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 11) of
Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny plaintiff Raymond Valenti’s motion
for a temporary restraining order contained in his complaint (Doc. 1).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and
finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 11) and
DENIES Valenti’s request for a temporary restraining order contained in his complaint (Doc. 1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 30, 2014

s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE