Camplin v. Wexford Institutional et al

Filing 75

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in itsentirety (Doc. 73 ) and DENIES Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48 ), Wexford Institutional (Doc. 45 ), and Christine Browns (Doc. 30 ) Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/20/2016. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM CAMPLIN, Plaintiff, vs. WEXFORD INSTITUTIONAL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-cv-00767-JPG-PMF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 73) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48), Wexford Institutional (Doc. 45), and Christine Brown’s (Doc. 30) Motions for Summary Judgment. There were no objections to the R & R and the time for filing an objection has passed. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 73) and DENIES Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48), Wexford Institutional (Doc. 45), and Christine Brown’s (Doc. 30) Motions for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/20/2016 s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?