Camplin v. Wexford Institutional et al

Filing 75

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in itsentirety (Doc. 73 ) and DENIES Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48 ), Wexford Institutional (Doc. 45 ), and Christine Browns (Doc. 30 ) Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/20/2016. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WILLIAM CAMPLIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WEXFORD INSTITUTIONAL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 14-cv-00767-JPG-PMF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 73) of
Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier with regard to Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48), Wexford Institutional
(Doc. 45), and Christine Brown’s (Doc. 30) Motions for Summary Judgment. There were no objections
to the R & R and the time for filing an objection has passed.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and
finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its
entirety (Doc. 73) and DENIES Defendants Dennis Els (Doc. 48), Wexford Institutional (Doc. 45), and
Christine Brown’s (Doc. 30) Motions for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 1/20/2016
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE