Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) L.L.C. v. Langham Co.

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to respond as an admission of the merits of the motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment and dismisses this action with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgmentaccordingly. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/8/15. (lmp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS EXTENSION PIPELINE
COMPANY, LLC (formerly known
as Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois) LLC),
Plaintiff,
vs.
LANGHAM CO., an Illinois corporation,
Defendant.

Case No. 14-cv-802-DRH-PMF
Order

Now before the Court is Defendants’ January 9, 2015 motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 22) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).
As of today’s date, plaintiff has not responded to the motion for summary
judgment.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court considers the failure to

respond as an admission of the merits of the motion for summary judgment. 1
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment. This action
is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court will enter judgment
accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 8th day of May, 2015.

Digitally signed by
David R. Herndon
Date: 2015.05.08
15:52:24 -05'00'
United States District Judge

1

Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: “Failure to timely file a response to a motion may, in
the Court’s discretion, be considered an admission of the merits of the motion.”