Garfield v. Furlong et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT in favor of Dennis Furlong, Dr Larson against John Garfield. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 3/31/17. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOHN GARFIELD, Plaintiff, vs. DENNIS FURLONG, JAY SWANSON, DEBBIE ISAACS, ZACHARY ROECKMAN, ASSISTANT WARDEN CREAG, NICK NALLEY, S.A. GODINEZ, DR. LARSON, and LOUIS SHICKER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 14-937-SCW Defendant(s). JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendants Jay Swanson, Debbie Isaacs, Zachary Roeckman, Assistant Warden Creag, S.A. Godinez and Louis Shicker were dismissed without prejudice on September 23, 2014 by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 8). As part of an Order by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on March 28, 2017 (Doc. 85) and an Amended Order on March 30, 2017 (Doc. 86), Defendant Nick Nalley was dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Dennis Furlong and Dr. Larson were granted summary judgment on March 28, 2017 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. (Doc. 85). THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants DENNIS FURLONG and DR. LARSON and against Plaintiff JOHN GARFIELD . Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action. The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for motions under Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown. DATED this 31st day of March, 2017 This period can only be JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald Deputy Clerk Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?