Abuharba v. Watson et al

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 35 ) and GRANTS Defendants' Motion (Doc. 31 ) to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and he Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment according. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/19/2016. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
MOHAMMED ABUHARBA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RICHARD WATSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 14-cv-01121-JPG-SCW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 35) of
Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams with regard to Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 31) to Dismiss for Lack
of Prosecution. There were no objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and
finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its
entirety (Doc. 35) and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion (Doc. 31) to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. This
matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and he Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment according.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 9/19/2016

s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE