Ajaj v. United States of America et al

Filing 124

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 114 ) and DENIES Defendant United States of America's Motion Doc. 111 to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status without prejudice. Defendant United St ates of America is GRANTED leave to refile its motion within 30 days of this order. Plaintiff's Motion Doc. 112 for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant's Motion to Revoke is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/22/2017. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
AHMAD M. AJAJ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 14-cv-01245-JPG-RJD

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc.
114) of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly with regard to Defendant United States of America’s
Motion [Doc. 111] to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status.

There were no objections

to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
Report in its entirety (Doc. 114) and DENIES Defendant United States of America’s Motion
[Doc. 111] to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status without prejudice. Defendant United
States of America is GRANTED leave to refile its motion; however, such motion must include
Page 1 of 2

an analysis of each alleged strike and be filed within 30 days of this order. Plaintiff’s Motion
[Doc. 112] for Extension of Time to Reply to Defendant’s Motion to Revoke is DENIED as
moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 3/22/2017
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2