Hindes v. BOP Medical Staff et al
Filing
146
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Leslee Duncan and Robert King against Richard Hindes. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/2/2018. (jdh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
RICHARD HINDES,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 14-cv-1272-JPG-DGW
BOP MEDICAL STAFF, LESLEE
DUNCAN, PAUL HARVEY, ROBERT
KING, PATRICK CUNNINGHAM and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
consolidated with
Defendants.
RICHARD HINDES,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-cv-1373-JPG-DGW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision as to some matters and a jury having rendered a decision as to others,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of
defendants Leslee Duncan (n/k/a Leslee Brooks) and Robert King and against plaintiff Richard
Hindes on Hindes’ Bivens claims for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the
Eighth Amendment;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Hinde’s Bivens claim against
defendant BOP Medical Staff for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the
Eighth Amendment is dismissed with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGES that the following claims are dismissed
without prejudice:
•
Hindes’ Bivens claims against defendants Paul Harvey and Patrick Cunningham for
deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and
•
Hindes’ Federal Tort Claims Act claim against the United States of America for inadequate
medical care.
DATED: October 2, 2018
THOMAS L. GALBRAITH, Acting Clerk of Court
s/ Tina Gray, Deputy Clerk
Approved:
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?