Williams v. Arbuckle et al

Filing 152

JUDGMENT in favor of Arbuckle, Densmore, Horvey, Counselor Ray, J Strubhart, Marc Hodges against Warren Williams. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 7/21/17. (amv)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WARREN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. ARBUCKLE, HORVEY, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., COUNSELOR RAY, J. STRUBHART, DENSMORE, WARDEN MARC HODGES and DUNCAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 14-1289-SCW Defendant(s). JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Defendants COUNSELOR RAY, J. STRUBHART and WARDEN MARC HODGES were dismissed with prejudice on November 24, 2017 by an Order entered by Judge J. Phil Gilbert (Doc. 6). Defendant DUNCAN was dismissed without prejudice on January 21, 2016 by an Order entered by Judge J. Phil Gilbert (Doc. 91). Defendants ARBUCKLE and HORVEY, were dismissed with prejudice on June 6, 2017 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 151). THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants ARBUCKLE, HORVEY, COUNSELOR RAY, J. STRUBHART, DENSMORE and WARDEN MARC HODGES and against Plaintiff WARREN WILLIAMS. All remaining issues s are dismissed in accordance with Order entered on June 6, 2017 by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 151) The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court. These deadlines for motions under The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal. extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown. DATED this 21st day of July, 2017 This period can only be JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald Deputy Clerk Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?