Williams v. Arbuckle et al
Filing
152
JUDGMENT in favor of Arbuckle, Densmore, Horvey, Counselor Ray, J Strubhart, Marc Hodges against Warren Williams. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 7/21/17. (amv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WARREN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ARBUCKLE, HORVEY, WEXFORD HEALTH
SOURCES, INC., COUNSELOR RAY, J.
STRUBHART, DENSMORE, WARDEN
MARC HODGES and DUNCAN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.
14-1289-SCW
Defendant(s).
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendants COUNSELOR RAY, J. STRUBHART and WARDEN MARC HODGES were
dismissed with prejudice on November 24, 2017 by an Order entered by Judge J. Phil
Gilbert (Doc. 6).
Defendant DUNCAN was dismissed without prejudice on January 21, 2016 by an
Order entered by Judge J. Phil Gilbert (Doc. 91).
Defendants ARBUCKLE and HORVEY, were dismissed with prejudice on June 6, 2017
by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 151).
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants ARBUCKLE, HORVEY,
COUNSELOR RAY, J. STRUBHART, DENSMORE and WARDEN MARC HODGES and against
Plaintiff WARREN WILLIAMS.
All remaining issues s are dismissed in accordance with
Order entered on June 6, 2017 by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 151)
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule
59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court.
These deadlines for motions under
The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30
days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal.
extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 21st day of July, 2017
This period can only be
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by
/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?