Castro v. USA et al
Filing
76
AMENDED JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/27/2017. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ANTHONY CASTRO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 14-cv-01331-JPG-RJD
AMENDED JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claims
against defendants C/O Humphrey, J.S. Walton, HSA Winklmeier, Patrick Trovillion,
RN Richardson, Eric Edmister, Leslee D. Brooks, C/O Tolbert, C/O Waters, C/O
Mowery, C/O Lenon, C/O Quartmous, C/O Hampton, C/O Cook, C/O Hicks, and C/O
Morris for the alleged constitutional violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights
(Counts 1 and 5), are dismissed without prejudice, and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claim against defendant
United States of America for the alleged negligent denial of medical care, under the FCTA
(Count 3), is dismissed without prejudice, and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claims against defendant
United States of America for the alleged negligent failure to protect Plaintiff, under the FTCA
(Count 2) and alleged violation of the ADA (Count 4), are dismissed with prejudice, and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of
defendants United States of America, C/O Humphrey, J.S. Walton, HSA Winklmeier,
Patrick Trovillion, RN Richardson, Eric Edmister, Leslee D. Brooks, C/O Tolbert, C/O
Page 1 of 2
Waters, C/O Mowery, C/O Lenon, C/O Quartmous, C/O Hampton, C/O Cook, C/O
Hicks, and C/O Morris and against plaintiff Anthony Castro on all claims, as Ordered and
Adjudged herein.
This case is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety.
DATED: 2/27/2017
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, Acting Clerk
By: s/Tina Gray
Deputy Clerk
Approved:
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. Phil Gilbert
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?