Davis v. Santos et al

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 31 ) and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 6 . Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/14/2015. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WILLIE DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
VENERIO SANTOS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-cv-00055-JPG-DGW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 31) of
Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc.
6). There were no objections filed with regard to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has
reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 31) and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
(Doc. 6).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 7/14/2015
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE