Butler v. Harrington et al
Filing
138
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Hart, Nippe, Veath, Brandon Anthony, Christopher McClure, Jeanette Hecht, John Doe, Joseph Goetz, Kimberly Butler, Lance Phelps, Laura Daniels, Richard Harrington against Plaintiff Kendrick Butler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 1/9/2018. (amv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
KENDRICK BUTLER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RICHARD HARRINGTON, KIM BUTLER, IA
BRANDON ANTHONY, JEANETTE HECHT,
JOSEPH GOETZ,HART, COUNSELOR
NIPPE, CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE, LANCE
PHELPS, JOHN DOE Correctional Officer
Shift Commander, JOHN DOE
Correctional Officer Supervisor and
VEATH,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.
15-63-SCW
Defendant(s).
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendants Richard Harrington, Kim Buter, Hart, Counselor Nippee and Veath were
dismissed with prejudice by Chief Judge Reagan on February 18, 2015 (Doc. 8).
Defendants John Doe Correctional Officer Shift Commander and John Doe
Correctional Officer Supervisor were dismissed by Chief Judge Reagan on June 28, 2017
(Doc. 73).
Defendant Lance Phelps was granted judgment as a matter of law on January 9,
2018 by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 131).
The remaining issues came before this Court for jury trial.
The issues have been
tried and the jury has rendered its Verdict (Doc.133) in favor of Defendants IA Brandon
Anthony, Jeanette Hecht, Joseph Goetz, Christopher McClure and against Plaintiff Kendrick
Butler.
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants RICHARD HARRINGTON,
KIM BUTLER, IA BRANDON ANTHONY, JEANETTE HECHT, JOSEPH GOETZ,HART,
COUNSELOR NIPPE, CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE, LANCE PHELPS, JOHN DOE Correctional
Officer Shift Commander, JOHN DOE Correctional Officer Supervisor and VEATH and
against Plaintiff KENDRICK BUTLER.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule
59(b) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 59 cannot be extended by the Court.
These deadlines for motions under
The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30
days from the date of this judgment to file a notice of appeal.
extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 9th day of January, 2018
This period can only be
JUSTINE FLANAGAN, ACTING CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by
/s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?