Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING 40 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Larry Dean Miller. Plaintiff proceeding pro se. In person Status Conference set for 7/28/2016 at 2:00 PM in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 6/23/16. (sgp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ) ) ) Defendant. LARRY DEAN MILLER, Case No. 3:15-cv-66-DRH-DGW ORDER WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge: Now pending before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw filed by Plaintiff’s counsel, Kenneth Leeds, on June 14, 2016 (Doc. 40). For the reasons set forth at the hearing held on June 22, 2016 (Doc. 44), and over Defendant’s objections, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is informed that he is now proceeding pro se in this matter, that is, without representation. Plaintiff should retain other counsel as soon as possible; however, if Plaintiff elects to proceed in this matter without an attorney, he should review the Pro Se Litigant Guide, located on the Court’s webpage, www. Ilsd.uscourts.gov (under the “Attorney Information tab). Plaintiff is required to notify the Clerk of Court of his current address and to file a notice within seven (7) days of any change in address. See Local Rule 3.1 This matter is set for an in person status conference on July 28, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in the East St. Louis Federal Courthouse, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201, Courtroom 4. If Plaintiff has not retained counsel by that date, he shall appear in person. Page 1 of 2 The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the address provided by his former counsel, 1171 Highway CC, Piedmont, Missouri 63957. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 23, 2016 DONALD G. WILKERSON United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?