Heyer v. Coe

Filing 39

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38 ) and GRANTS Defendant Dr. Coe's Motion (Doc. 32 ) for Summary Judgment. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/31/2017. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
MARK HEYER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
DR. JOHN COE,
Defendant.

Case No. 15-cv-00219-JPG-RJD

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 38) of
Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly with regard to Defendant Dr. Coe’s Motion (Doc. 32) for Summary
Judgment. There were no objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and
finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its
entirety (Doc. 38) and GRANTS Defendant Dr. Coe’s Motion (Doc. 32) for Summary Judgment. This
matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment

accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 7/31/2017

s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE