Harris v. Larson et al

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38 ); and DENIES as moot Harris motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 2 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/24/2015. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
DARIUS HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.

No. 15-cv-252-JPG-DGW

DR. DENNIS LARSON, DR. VIPIN SHAH,
GARY GERST, DAN VAREL, ZACHARY
ROECKEMAN and UNKNOWN REGIONAL
DIRECTOR OF WEXFORD HEALTH
SOURCES, INC.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
38) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson recommending that the Court deny as moot plaintiff
Darius Harris’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 2) in light of the fact that he has been
scheduled to be given the relief (an MRI) he seeks in the motion.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38); and



DENIES as moot Harris’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 24, 2015
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE