Johnson v. Robinson et al

Filing 77

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/13/2017. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-298-JPG-RJD ROSALIND ROBINSON, WALESKA LIRIOS, JAMES CROSS and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Defendants. JUDGMENT This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered as follows:  in favor of defendants Robinson and Lirios and against plaintiff Johnson on Count 1, an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim for endangering Johnson’s safety through housing decisions made on or after December 4, 2013;  in favor of defendants Robinson and Lirios and against plaintiff Johnson on Count 2, a Fifth Amendment equal protection claim for housing decisions made on or after December 4, 2013; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed without prejudice:  Counts 1 and 2 to the extent they rest on housing decisions made before December 4, 2013, for which plaintiff Johnson did not exhaust administrative remedies;  Count 3, a Fifth Amendment due process claim against defendant Cross in connection with discipline proceedings in November 2013 and January 2014;  Count 4, a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Robinson, Lirios and Unknown Parties based on retaliation for Johnson’s filing of administrative grievances; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice:  Count 5: a claim under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act against defendant Robinson for disclosing Johnson’s HIV-positive status. DATED: November 13, 2017 JUSTINE FLANAGAN, Acting Clerk of Court s/Tina Gray, Deputy Clerk Approved: s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?