Luera v. Godinez et al

Filing 238

JUDGMENT in favor of John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, Major Lyerla, Margaret Thompson, Michael Lemke, Rick Harrington, Salvador A. Godinez, Sergeant Birk, Tracey Engelson against Jose Luera. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 12/17/2018. (amv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JOSE LUERA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, TRACEY
ENGELSON, MARGARET THOMPSON,
MAJOR LYERLA, SERGEANT BIRK,
JOHN DOE, WEXFORD HEALTH
SOURCES, INC., JOHN BALDWIN,
RICK HARRINGTON, MICHAEL
LEMKE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2,
and JOHN DOE #3,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 15-350-SCW

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendant Sergeant Birk was dismissed on April 3, 2014 by an Order entered by Judge
Andrea R. Wood (Doc. 31).
Defendants John Doe and Wexford Health Sources, Inc., were dismissed on January 3, 2017
by an Order entered by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 126).
Defendants Salvador A. Godinez, Tracey Engelson, Margaret Thompson, Rick Harrington,
Michael Lemke, missed granted summary judgment on August 8, 2018 by an Order entered by
Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 199).
Defendants John Doe #1, John Doe #2, and John Doe #3, were dismissed on August 8,
2018 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 197).
A jury verdict was returned in favor of Defendant Douglas Lyerla and against Plaintiff Jose
Luera on November 20, 2018 (Doc. 232).
Plaintiff’s Injunctive Relief claim was denied on December 13, 2018 by an Order entered by
Page 1 of 2

Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 235).
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Salvador A. Godinez,
Tracey Engelson, Margaret Thompson, Major Lyerla, Sergeant Birk, Rick Harrington,
Michael Lemke, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, and John Doe #3, , and against Plaintiff Jose
Luera.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this
judgment for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or
(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for motions under Rule 59 cannot be
extended by the Court. The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this
judgment to file a notice of appeal. This period can only be extended if excusable neglect or good
cause is shown.
DATED this 17th rd day of December, 2018
MARGARET M. ROBERTIE, CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams

Page 2 of 2