Floyd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 26 ) and GRANTS Dr. Bharat Shah's Motion (Doc. 22 ) for SummaryJudgment. Defendant Dr. Bharat Shah is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 7/27/2016. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
THOMAS LAWRENCE FLOYD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 15-cv-00429-JPG-DGW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc.
26) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Defendant Dr. Bharat Shah’s
Motion (Doc. 22) for Summary Judgment. There were no objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
Report in its entirety (Doc. 26) and GRANTS Dr. Bharat Shah’s Motion (Doc. 22) for Summary
Judgment. Defendant Dr. Bharat Shah is DISMISSED without prejudice.
There are no remaining defendants. As such, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter
judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 7/27/2016
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?