Miller v. Walton et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in itsentirety (Doc. 183 ) and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court Ordered mental Health Care (Doc. 107 ). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/21/2016. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROBERT ETHAN MILLER, JR.,
DONTE ROLAND HARRIS, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-00533-JPG-DGW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 183) of
Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Court Ordered
mental Health Care (Doc. 107). There were no objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of
the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de
novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new
hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence
deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and
finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its
entirety (Doc. 183) and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion Requesting Court Ordered mental Health Care (Doc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?