Miller v. Walton et al
Filing
228
AMENDED JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/9/2017. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
ROBERT ETHAN MILLER, JR.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
J.S. WALTON, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 15-cv-00533-JPG-DGW
AMENDED JUDGMENT
This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court
having rendered a decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claims
against defendants Burgess, Byram, Watts, Walton and Laird for exposing plaintiff to inmates
who have “hits” out on plaintiff’s life in violation of his constitutional and statutory rights are
dismissed without prejudice. All other claims against J.S. Walton, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brooks,
Mr. Malcolm, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Buser, Ms. Byram, Mr. Burgess, Ms. Siereveld, Mr. Cope,
Paul M. Laird, Richard Schott, and Harrell Watts are dismissed without prejudice and IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants,
J.S. Walton, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Malcolm, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Buser, Ms. Byram,
Mr. Burgess, Ms. Siereveld, Mr. Cope, Paul M. Laird, Richard Schott, and Harrell Watts
and against plaintiff Robert Ethan Miller, Jr.
DATED: 8/9/2017
Justine Flanagan
Acting Clerk of Court
s/Tina Gray, Deputy Clerk
Approved:
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?