Miller v. Walton et al

Filing 228

AMENDED JUDGMENT. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/9/2017. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROBERT ETHAN MILLER, JR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. J.S. WALTON, et al., Defendants. Case No. 15-cv-00533-JPG-DGW AMENDED JUDGMENT This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Claims against defendants Burgess, Byram, Watts, Walton and Laird for exposing plaintiff to inmates who have “hits” out on plaintiff’s life in violation of his constitutional and statutory rights are dismissed without prejudice. All other claims against J.S. Walton, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Malcolm, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Buser, Ms. Byram, Mr. Burgess, Ms. Siereveld, Mr. Cope, Paul M. Laird, Richard Schott, and Harrell Watts are dismissed without prejudice and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants, J.S. Walton, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Malcolm, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Buser, Ms. Byram, Mr. Burgess, Ms. Siereveld, Mr. Cope, Paul M. Laird, Richard Schott, and Harrell Watts and against plaintiff Robert Ethan Miller, Jr. DATED: 8/9/2017 Justine Flanagan Acting Clerk of Court s/Tina Gray, Deputy Clerk Approved: s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?