Watford v. Ellis et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT in favor of Wexford Health Services, Brad Bramlet, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Jenny Clendenin, John Doe, John R Baldwin, Kimberly Butler, Lacy Ream, Officer Ellis, Officer New, Officer Wooley, Richard Harrington, Roy W Rose, Sergeant Richards, Tonya Knust against Marlon L. Watford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 12/14/2018. (amv) Modified on 12/14/2018 (amv).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
MARLON L. WATFORD,
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER ELLIS, BRAD BRAMLET,
TONYA KNUST, LACY REAM, OFFICER
WOOLEY, OFFICER NEW, SERGEANT
RICHARDS, RICHARD HARRINGTON,
JENNY CLENDENIN, KIMBERLY
BUTLER, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2,
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, ROY
W. ROSE, JOHN R. BALDWIN, and
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 15-567-SCW

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Defendants Roy W. Rose and Wexford Health Services were dismissed on March 28, 2016 by
the filing of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 23).
Defendants Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet Tonya Knust, Lacy Ream, Jenny Clendenin, John Doe
1 and John Doe 2 were dimissed from this action on May 25, 2016 by an Order entered by Chief Judge
Michael J. Reagan (Doc. 24).
Defendants Officer New, Sergeant Richards, and Richard Harrington were granted summary
judgment on July 23, 2018 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc. 77).
Defendant Kimberly Butler was substituted on August 9, 2018 by Magistrate Judge Stephen C.
Williams (Doc. 81).
The remaining issues came before this Court for trial. Plaintiff’s RLUIPA claim was
Page 1 of 2

dismissed on December 12, 2018 by an Order entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams (Doc.
86).
THEREFORE, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet,
Tonya Knust, Larry Ream, Officer Wooley, Officer New, Sergeant Richards, Richard Harrington,
Jenny Clendenin, Kimberly Butler, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Wexford Health Services, Roy W. Rose,
John R. Baldwin, and Jacqueline Lashbrook and against Plaintiff Marlon L. Watford.
The Plaintiff should take notice of the fact that he has 28 days from the date of this judgment
for filing a motion for new trial or motion to amend or alter judgment under Rule 59(b) or (e) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These deadlines for motions under Rule 59 cannot be extended by
the Court. The Plaintiff should also note that he has 30 days from the date of this judgment to file a
notice of appeal. This period can only be extended if excusable neglect or good cause is shown.
DATED this 14th day of December, 2018
MARGARET M. ROBERTIE, CLERK
BY: /s/ Angela Vehlewald
Deputy Clerk
Approved by /s/ Stephen C. Williams
United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen C. Williams

Page 2 of 2