Schwaninger v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
Filing
160
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court GRANTS the motion to withdraw (Doc. 159). To achieve the result expressed by Hyundai Mobis in that motion, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to STRIKE Hyundai Mobis's pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 107) and OR DERS that Hyundai Mobis shall have up to and including December 16, 2016, to refile its motion to dismiss omitting the personal jurisdiction argument but including the statute of limitations and sufficiency of the pleading arguments. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/29/2016. (jdh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JANET SCHWANINGER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 15-cv-858-JPG-RJD
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on a letter to the Court dated November 23, 2016 (Doc.
159), which the Court construes as a motion to withdraw portions of the pending motion to dismiss
filed by defendant Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. (“Hyundai Mobis”). In the letter, Hyundai Mobis
informs the Court that it wishes to withdraw the argument that it is not subject to the Court’s
jurisdiction, although it wishes to maintain its statute of limitations and sufficiency of the pleading
arguments contained in the motion to dismiss.
The Court GRANTS the motion to withdraw (Doc. 159). To achieve the result expressed
by Hyundai Mobis in that motion, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to STRIKE Hyundai
Mobis’s pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 107) and ORDERS that Hyundai Mobis shall have up to
and including December 16, 2016, to refile its motion to dismiss omitting the personal jurisdiction
argument but including the statute of limitations and sufficiency of the pleading arguments. The
briefing schedule for the newly filed motion shall comply with the deadlines set forth in Local
Rule 7.1(c).
T IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 29, 2016
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?