Ickes v. USA et al

Filing 83

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 81 ); GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 75 ); and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to TERMINATE Doctor King as a defendant. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/1/2017. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KEVIN J. ICKES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:15-cv-907-JPG-SCW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 81) of Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams with regard to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 75.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 81);  GRANTS the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 75); and  DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to TERMINATE “Doctor King” as a defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 1, 2017 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?