Poletti et al v. Syngenta AG et al

Filing 352

ORDER re Attorney Fee Submissions. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 7/18/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A Fee and Expense Spreadsheet)(ceh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

--------------------------------------------------------------IN RE SYNGENTA MASS TORT ACTIONS
---------------------------------------------------------------

Judge David R. Herndon
This Document Relates to:

Tweet, et al. v. Syngenta AG, et al.
No. 3:16-cv-00255-DRH

Poletti, et al. v. Syngenta AG, et al.
No. 3:15-cv-01221-DRH, and

ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEY FEE SUBMISSONS
This Order is entered with regard to the Fee and Expense Application of
Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, and its Co-Counsel (“fee motion”) (doc. 249). The
fee motion arises from work on the group of lawsuits filed in multiple federal and
state courts arising from Syngenta’s development and sale of corn seeds
containing genetically modified traits known as MIR 162 and Event 5307 before
China’s approval to import corn with those traits. These include:
The multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding in the United
States District Court for the District of Kansas, MDL No.
2591, before U.S. District Judge John W. Lungstrum and U.S.
Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara;

Tweet et al v. Syngenta AG et al, No. 3:16-cv-00255, and
Poletti et al v. Syngenta AG et al, No. 3:15-cv-01221, pending
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Illinois before U.S. District Judge David. R. Herndon; and

In re Syngenta Litigation, No. 27-cv-15-3785, pending in the
Minnesota Fourth Judicial District Court before Judge Laurie
Miller.
Pursuant to Judge Lungstrum’s Order which preliminarily approved class
settlement (see District Court for the District of Kansas case no. 2:14-MD-2591JWL-JPO, doc. 3532), motions and petitions for awards of attorney fees and
expenses and for service/case contribution/incentive awards were due by July 10,
2018, with any responses to these motions/petitions due by October 17, 2018. In
accordance with this directive, the law firm of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC and
its co-counsel filed its motion for fees on July 10th (doc. 349).
The Judges on the Syngenta matters, Judge Lungstrum, Judge Herndon,
and Judge Miller, have all agreed to the following deadlines for any fee motions
filed in their respective courts to meet the objectives of consistency and
expediency. The following deadlines contained in this Order preempt any default
deadlines or any deadlines previously set.

Accordingly, the Court orders as

follows:
1.

The October 17 deadline for responses to the fee motion is hereby

vacated. Any responses to the fee motion shall be filed by August 17, 2018, with
any reply briefs filed by September 17, 2018.

2

These deadlines will allow

sufficient time for the issues to be fully briefed and considered before the final
approval hearing.
2.

The Court appreciates the thorough submission by counsel with

respect to their fee requests. However, the Court is requiring completion and
submission of Excel spreadsheets so that certain basic fee and expense
information can be presented to the Court and Special Masters in standardized
summary format that will facilitate review and evaluation of hours and expense
data. Review will not be limited to the information submitted on these forms;
information previously submitted in the fee motion will be considered, and
counsel are also free to submit with their reply briefs any additional information
they believe is relevant to determining (a) what portion of the Settlement Amount
should be allocated to attorney fees and expenses and (b) the appropriate
allocation of that amount among plaintiffs’ counsel.
Accordingly, the fee motion (doc. 249) filed with this Court, shall be
supplemented by August 3, 2018, as follows.

Petitioners shall complete and

submit an Excel spreadsheet in the form attached hereto as Appendix A (an
electronic copy of which will be posted in Excel form on the District Court for the
District of Kansas’ webpage for the Syngenta MDL). Petitioners should provide
information on a firmwide basis for each category of timekeeper (attorneys,
contract attorneys, non-attorneys), without breaking down that information by
individual timekeeper. Petitioners should also be sure to complete both of the
spreadsheet’s “sheets” (one for fees, the other for expenses).

3

Each petitioner

should (a) file (through ECF) a printout of its spreadsheet in PDF form and (b)
submit an electronic copy of its spreadsheet in Excel form by email to the Special
Masters.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Herndon
2018.07.18
15:17:59 -05'00'
United States District Judge

4