Norfleet v. IDOC et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 41 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 6 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 10/03/2016. (tfs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MARC NORFLEET,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, PATRICK KEANE,
GLADYSE C. TAYLOR, and SHERRY
BENTON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-CV-1279-SMY-DGW

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Wilkerson (Doc. 41).

Judge Wilkerson recommends that the undersigned deny Plaintiff’s

Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 6). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report. For
the following reasons, Judge Wilkerson’s Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court, having received no objection to the Report and having reviewed Plaintiff’s
motions and the case history, finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the
Report of Magistrate Judge Wilkerson (Doc. 41) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff’s request for a

Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 6) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 3, 2016
s/ Staci M. Yandle
STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge

2