Hutchison v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 8/10/2016. (jmt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHARLES BRIAN HUTCHISON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. Civil No. 15-cv-1281-CJP ORDER for ATTORNEY’S FEES PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is the Defendant’s Agreed Motion to Award Attorney Fees. (Doc. 22). Defendant represents that the parties have agreed that plaintiff is entitled to an award in the amount of $6,142.00 for attorney’s fees and no additional sum for costs. Further, this award shall fully satisfy any claims for fees, costs and expenses that may be payable in this case under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412. The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees, expenses and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable and appropriate. Defendant’s Agreed Motion to Award Attorney Fees (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. The Court awards plaintiff the sum of $6,142.00 (six thousand, one hundred and 1 forty-two dollars) for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. These funds are payable to plaintiff, per Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). However, in accordance with the parties’ agreement, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay plaintiff’s pre-existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment previously executed by plaintiff and his attorney. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: August 10, 2016. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?