Stewart v. Guyer/Dryer et al
Filing
8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 1/27/2016. (tjk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
OTIS STEWART,
#B-25889,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MIKE GUYER/DRYER
and WARDEN STEPHEN DUNCAN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 16-cv-0006-SMY
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YANDLE, District Judge:
This case was severed from Stewart v. Wexford Health Source, Inc., et al., No. 15-cv1322-MJR-SCW (original case), pursuant to a Memorandum and Order entered in that case on
January 4, 2016. (See Doc. 1, instant case). Consistent with the Memorandum and Order, the
instant case will address the claim in Count 3 of the original case against Defendants
Guyer/Dryer and Duncan for housing Plaintiff in unsanitary conditions and failing to repair his
broken toilet for seven days. As discussed in the Memorandum and Order, this claim survives
preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and shall proceed at this time. An additional filing
fee shall be assessed in this case.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants MIKE
GUYER/DRYER 1 and WARDEN STEPHEN DUNCAN (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and
Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons).
1
As discussed in the Memorandum and Order (see Doc. 1 in the instant case, p. 4), Plaintiff listed Defendant Guyer
as a party and described him as a plumber, but then later referred to the plumber as Defendant Dryer. The Court
presumed that Plaintiff was referring to the same party, but was confused as to the spelling of his name. Therefore,
the Court elected to refer to this Defendant as Mike Guyer/Dryer. Once Plaintiff has identified the correct spelling
of this Defendant’s name, he should notify the Court so that the record reflects the proper spelling of this
Defendant’s name.
Page 1 of 3
The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail these forms, a copy of the Complaint (Doc. 2), the
Memorandum and Order (Doc. 1), and this Memorandum and Order to the Defendants’ place of
employment as identified by Plaintiff. If a Defendant fails to sign and return the Waiver of
Service of Summons (Form 6) to the Clerk within 30 days from the date the forms were sent, the
Clerk shall take appropriate steps to effect formal service on that Defendant, and the Court will
require that Defendant to pay the full costs of formal service, to the extent authorized by the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
With respect to a Defendant who no longer can be found at the work address provided by
Plaintiff, the employer shall furnish the Clerk with the Defendant’s current work address, or, if
not known, the Defendant’s last-known address. This information shall be used only for sending
the forms as directed above or for formally effecting service. Any documentation of the address
shall be retained only by the Clerk. Address information shall not be maintained in the court file
or disclosed by the Clerk.
Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants (or upon defense counsel once an appearance is
entered), a copy of every pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court.
Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed a certificate stating the date on which a
true and correct copy of the document was served on Defendants or counsel. Any paper received
by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the Clerk or that fails to
include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Court.
Defendants are ORDERED to timely file an appropriate responsive pleading to the
complaint and shall not waive filing a reply pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g).
Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(a)(2), this action is REFERRED to a United States
Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial proceedings, which shall include a determination on the
Page 2 of 3
pending motion for recruitment of counsel (Doc. 4).
Further, this entire matter shall be
REFERRED to a United States Magistrate Judge for disposition, pursuant to Local Rule
72.2(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), if all parties consent to such a referral.
If judgment is rendered against Plaintiff, and the judgment includes the payment of costs
under § 1915, Plaintiff will be required to pay the full amount of the costs, notwithstanding the
fact that his application to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted.
See 28 U.S.C. §
1915(f)(2)(A).
Plaintiff is ADVISED that at the time application was made under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for
leave to commence this civil action without being required to prepay fees and costs or give
security for the same, the applicant and his or her attorney were deemed to have entered into a
stipulation that the recovery, if any, secured in the action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court,
who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs taxed against plaintiff and remit the balance to plaintiff.
Local Rule 3.1(c)(1).
Finally, Plaintiff is ADVISED that he is under a continuing obligation to keep the Clerk
of Court and each opposing party informed of any change in his address; the Court will not
independently investigate his whereabouts. This shall be done in writing and not later than
7 days after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to comply with this order will
cause a delay in the transmission of court documents and may result in dismissal of this action
for want of prosecution. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 27, 2016
s/ STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?