Gray v. Shah et al

Filing 57

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Director I.D.O.C., Suzann Bailey, Vipin Shah, Warden Lashbrook against Eric Gray. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/28/2016. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ERIC GRAY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. DR. BAHRAT SHAH, et al., Defendants. Case No. 16-cv-00039-JPG-RJD JUDGMENT This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the claims against defendants Vipin Shah, Director I.D.O.C., Suzann Bailey, and Warden Lashbrook for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's medical needs in violation of the 8th Amendment and conspiracy claims are dismissed without prejudice and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Vipin Shah, Director I.D.O.C., Suzann Bailey, and Warden Lashbrook and against plaintiff Eric Gray on his claim for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the 8th Amendment and conspiracy claims. DATED: 12/28/2016 Justine Flanagan Acting Clerk of Court s/Tina Gray, Deputy Clerk Approved: s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?