Meyer v. Wexford Health Sources et al

Filing 46

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 45 ) and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Wexford Health Sources and Dr. J. Coe's (Doc. 33 ) for Summary Judgment. Defendant Coe is DIMISSED without prejudice. Count Two against Defendant Wexfordshall proceed. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/17/2017. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
PATRICK MEYER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 16-cv-00173-JPG-DGW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc.
45) of Magistrate Judge Donald Wilkerson with regard to Defendants Wexford Health Sources
and Dr. J. Coe’s (Doc. 33) for Summary Judgment. There were no objections to the R & R.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the
magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. “If no objection or
only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear
error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the
Report in its entirety (Doc. 45) and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Wexford
Health Sources and Dr. J. Coe’s (Doc. 33) for Summary Judgment.

Defendant Coe is DIMISSED without prejudice. Count Two against Defendant Wexford
shall proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 3/17/2017
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE