Tweet et al v. Syngenta AG et al
Filing
210
ORDER granting 209 Consent Motion to Dismiss and Stipulation for the Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Claims Against Louis Dreyfus Company BV. Plaintiffs' claims against Louis Dreyfus Company BV are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 3/30/2017. (ceh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN RE SYNGENTA MASS TORT ACTIONS
Judge David R. Herndon
This Document Relates to:
Tweet, et. al. v. Syngenta AG et al. No. 3:16cv-00255-DRH
ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION TO DISMISS AND STIPULATION
FOR THE DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST
LOUIS DREYFUS COMPANY BV
Louis Dreyfus Company BV (“LDC BV”) 1 and plaintiffs stipulate that the
reasoning behind the Court’s dismissal of claims against Cargill, ADM, Bunge,
and Louis Dreyfus Company LLC would apply equally to LDC BV, as plaintiffs
make the same substantive allegations with respect to LDC BV’s conduct as with
conduct by Cargill, ADM, Bunge, and Louis Dreyfus Company.
Therefore,
plaintiffs’ claims against LDC BV are DISMISSED ON THE MERITS WITH
PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Court’s January 4, 2017 dismissal
order (Doc. 185).
Notwithstanding the stipulation of dismissal and this Order, plaintiffs
preserve all rights that they may have for attempting to challenge the Court’s
dismissal order, and plaintiffs preserve their rights to similarly challenge the
1
LDC BV was previously known as Louis Dreyfus Commodities BV.
1
dismissal of LDC BV. LDC BV preserves all defenses that it may have to the
Third Amended Consolidated Complaint including but not limited to those related
to personal jurisdiction and those set forth in the Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s
Third Amended Consolidated Complaint (Doc. 138).
SO ORDERED THIS 30th day of MARCH, 2017.
Digitally signed by Judge David
R. Herndon
Date: 2017.03.30 09:41:50 -05'00'
_________________________________________
DAVID R. HERNDON
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?