Brady McCasland, Inc. v. Womack et al

Filing 10

ORDER dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 4/7/16. (klh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRADY MACCASLAND, INC., Plaintiff v. No. 16-0380-DRH JAMES WOMACK and JORDAN WOMACK, Defendants. MEMORANDUM and ORDER HERNDON, District Judge: On April 5, 2016, plaintiff filed suit against defendants for breach of contract based on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Doc. 1). However, a review of the complaint reveals that plaintiff alleged residency rather than citizenship as to the parties in the complaint. “[R]esidence and citizenship are not synonyms and it is the latter that matters for purposes of the diversity jurisdiction.” Meyerson v. Harrah's E. Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002). See also Tylka v. Gerber Prods. Co., 211 F.3d 445, 448 (7th Cir. 2000) (“[A]llegations of residence are insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction.”); Held v. Held, 137 F.3d 998, 1000 (7th Cir. 1998) (same). Further, a corporation is deemed a citizen of both the state of incorporation and its principal place of business. N. Page 1 of 2 Bunge Corp., 899 F.2d 591, 594 (7th Cir.1990); see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). The term “principal place of business” refers to the corporation's “nerve center”-the place where a corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities. Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 92–93, 130 S.Ct. 1181, 175 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2010). Thus, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff’s complaint. The Court ALLOWS plaintiff up to and including May 6, 2016 to file an amended complaint that comports with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Digitally signed by Judge David R. Herndon Date: 2016.04.07 13:27:30 -05'00' Signed this 7th day of April, 2016. United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?