Hagopian v. Madison County Jail et al

Filing 57

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 47 ); and DENIES the remaining defendants' motion (Doc. 22 ) without prejudice to their filing another summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/9/2017. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
BRANDON PATRICK HAGOPIAN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 16-cv-602-JPG-DGW

MADISON COUNTY JAIL, MADISON COUNTY
JAIL STAFF, CAPTAIN JOSEPH, DR.
BLANKENSHIP, CAPTAIN BOST, JOHN LAKIN,
NURSE MAJOR, NURSE RUSHING, NURSE
BASSETT, NURSE KOTZAMANIS, AARON
OMOTOLA, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE A,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
47) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson recommending that the Court deny the remaining
defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 47); and



DENIES the remaining defendants’ motion (Doc. 22) without prejudice to their filing
another summary judgment motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 9, 2017
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE