Hagopian v. Madison County Jail et al

Filing 57

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 47 ); and DENIES the remaining defendants' motion (Doc. 22 ) without prejudice to their filing another summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/9/2017. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRANDON PATRICK HAGOPIAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-602-JPG-DGW MADISON COUNTY JAIL, MADISON COUNTY JAIL STAFF, CAPTAIN JOSEPH, DR. BLANKENSHIP, CAPTAIN BOST, JOHN LAKIN, NURSE MAJOR, NURSE RUSHING, NURSE BASSETT, NURSE KOTZAMANIS, AARON OMOTOLA, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE A, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson recommending that the Court deny the remaining defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 47); and  DENIES the remaining defendants’ motion (Doc. 22) without prejudice to their filing another summary judgment motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 9, 2017 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?