Everett v. Herndon

Filing 19

ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 11 ) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 11/2/2016. (tfs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CHARLES M. EVERETT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DISTRICT JUDGE HERNDON,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 16-CV-648-SMY-DGW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma
pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. 11). A federal court may permit a party to proceed on appeal without full
pre-payment of fees provided the party is indigent and the appeal is taken in good faith. 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) & (3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). A frivolous appeal cannot be made in
good faith. Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026-27 (7th Cir. 2000). The test for determining if
an appeal is in good faith and not frivolous is whether any of the legal points are reasonably
arguable on their merits. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (citing Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)); Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 632 (7th Cir. 2000).
The Court has no doubt that Plaintiff is indigent.

However, the appeal is clearly

frivolous. As an initial matter, Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (Doc. 10) refers to the undersigned
as “Defendant” when the only named defendant in this action is “District Judge Herndon”. The
undersigned is not a party to this litigation. The Notice is nothing more than a mish-mash of
rambling and incoherent facts from which it is impossible to even discern what Plaintiff is
seeking to appeal.

It is simply incomprehensible and cannot be taken in good faith.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 11) is DENIED.

Moreover, according to 28 U.S.C. s1915(e)(2), the Court "shall dismiss the case at any
time if the court determines that…the action…frivolous or malicious" or "fails to state a claim on
which relief may be granted…" A claim may be dismissed as frivolous, under the IFP statute,
when the claim's factual contentions are clearly baseless or when the claim is based on an
indisputably meritless legal theory. Wemple v. All Illinois Judicial Circuits, 778 F.Supp.2d 930,
932 (C.D. Ill. April 21, 2011). Here, like his Notice of Appeal, Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 2) is
incoherent and incomprehensible, rendering the Complaint frivolous. As such, the Complaint
must be dismissed.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 11) is
DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. All other pending motions are DENIED
AS MOOT and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 2, 2016
s/ Staci M. Yandle
STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge

2