Paige v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al

Filing 55

ORDER ADOPTING the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Daly (Doc. 54 ). Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (Doc. 39 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 8/24/2018. (bps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CORY PAIGE, Plaintiff, vs. KIMBERLY BUTLER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 16-CV-858-SMY-RJD MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 54) recommending the denial of Defendants Butler, Mathis, Pierce, Smolak, Caron and Howell’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Doc. 39). No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2); SDIL-LR 73.1(b). For the following reasons, Judge Daly’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report and Recommendation are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may then “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Here, Judge Daly thoroughly discussed and supported her conclusion that Plaintiff has exhausted his available administrative remedies regarding his claims in this matter. The Court fully agrees with Judge Daly’s findings, analysis and conclusions, and accordingly, adopts her Page 1 of 2 Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 24, 2018 s/ Staci M. Yandle STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?