Thomas v. Lakin

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 22 ), GRANTS Lakin's motion to dismiss (Doc. 19 ), DISMISSES without prejudice as moot Thomas's claim for injunctive relief under RLUIPA, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/21/2018. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS FRANK THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-cv-896-JPG-SCW JOHN LAKIN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 22) of Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams recommending that the Court grant the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Lakin (Doc. 19) and dismiss as moot plaintiff Frank Thomas’s claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 52 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a), in light of his transfer away from the jail Lakin runs. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 22);  GRANTS Lakin’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 19);  DISMISSES without prejudice as moot Thomas’s claim for injunctive relief under RLUIPA; and  DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 21, 2018 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?