Mershah v. Pulaski County Dentention Center et al
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, defendants Tarah Riddle and Janna Cornelius' Motion (Doc. 25 ) to Dismiss Under Rule 41(b) and defendant Charles Paulius' Motion (Doc. 27 ) to Dismiss Under Rule 41(b) are GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 6/13/2017. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
NAENB MERSHAH,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PULASKI COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 16-cv-00961-JPG-RJD
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on defendants Tarah Riddle and Janna Cornelius’
Motion (Doc. 25) to Dismiss Under Rule 41(b) and defendant Charles Paulius’ Motion (Doc. 27)
to Dismiss Under Rule 41(b). Both motions move the Court to dismiss this matter for lack of
prosecution and the plaintiff’s failure to comply with Court Orders and local rules.
The plaintiff filed his Complaint (Doc. 1) on August 26, 2016 and amended his complaint
on September 22, 2016 (Doc. 3). The Plaintiff has had no other filing with this Court since
September 22, 2017.
The defendants state1 that the plaintiff has failed to respond to any written discovery
requests and that mail addressed to the plaintiff, at the address on file with the Court, is retuned
to their office. This Court issued a Show Cause Order (Doc. 26) on May 12th, 2017, directing the
plaintiff to respond and show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure
to keep his address current with the Court. Plaintiff was further warned that failure to respond to
the show cause order may result in the dismissal of this matter. The Court sent a copy of the
Show Cause Order to plaintiff’s current address on file and it was returned undeliverable.
1
Defendant Paulisu adopted the arguments set forth in defendants Riddle and Cornelius’ motion. As such, the
Court will refer to Paulisu, Riddle and Cornelius collectively as defendants.
1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that the Court may involuntarily dismiss a
matter if a plaintiff fails to prosecute. Plaintiff was warned in this Court’s order referring the
case to Magistrate Judge Daly (Doc. 7) as follows:
Plaintiff is ADVISED that he is under a continuing obligation to keep the Clerk
of Court and each opposing party informed of any change in his address; the
Court will not independently investigate his whereabouts. This shall be done in
writing and not later than 7 days after a transfer or other change in address occurs.
Failure to comply with this order will cause a delay in the transmission of court
documents and may result in dismissal of this action for want of prosecution.
Plaintiff has failed to keep the court advised of his current address and has failed to
comply with this Court’s order with regard to discovery. He failed to respond to either of the
defendants’ motion and failed to respond to this Court’s Show Cause Order. As such, plaintiff
has failed to diligently prosecute this matter.
Therefore, defendants Tarah Riddle and Janna Cornelius’ Motion (Doc. 25) to Dismiss
Under Rule 41(b) and defendant Charles Paulius’ Motion (Doc. 27) to Dismiss Under Rule 41(b)
are GRANTED and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this case is DISMISSED
without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment
accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 6/13/2017
s/J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?