Abbott v. Lakin et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38 ), GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20 ), and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Deputy Tassone. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Deputy Tassone as a defendant in this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/23/2018. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JAMES ABBOTT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:16-cv-01105-JPG-RJD DEPUTY LEMARR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 38) of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly with regard to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, the Court has received plaintiff’s objection to the report (Doc. 40), but the objection only re-states his claim that he needed stitches. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38);  GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20); and  DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Deputy Tassone. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Deputy Tassone as a defendant in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: MARCH 23, 2018 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?