Abbott v. Lakin et al
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38 ), GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20 ), and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Deputy Tassone. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Deputy Tassone as a defendant in this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/23/2018. (jdh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JAMES ABBOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:16-cv-01105-JPG-RJD
DEPUTY LEMARR, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
38) of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly with regard to the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 20). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings
or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made.
Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those
unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999).
Here, the Court has received plaintiff’s objection to the report (Doc. 40), but the
objection only re-states his claim that he needed stitches. The Court has reviewed the entire file
and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 38);
GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment (Doc. 20); and
DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Deputy Tassone. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of
Court to terminate Deputy Tassone as a defendant in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: MARCH 23, 2018
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?