Williams v. Brown

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for failure to comply with an order of this Court. This dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/26/2017. (tjk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MICHELLE WILLIAMS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. JEFF BROWN Defendant. Case No. 17−cv–0289−JPG MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GILBERT, District Judge: On January 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed this Complaint, as part of a group of Plaintiffs seeking relief for conditions at Bond County Jail in Case No. 17-cv-006-JPG. The undersigned ultimately concluded that Plaintiff Williams’ claims were unrelated to the other plaintiffs and severed her claims into the present action. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff was also directed to file an Amended Complaint, no later than April 14, 2017. (Doc. 1, p. 11). The deadline has now passed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time to do so. The Court therefore finds that Plaintiff is not in compliance with its March 20th Order directing her to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 1). As a result, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and for failure to comply with an order of this Court. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); see generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). This dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff’s three allotted “strikes” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 1 If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this Order, she may file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty days of the entry of judgment. FED. R. APP. 4(A)(4). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, she will be liable for the $505.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. See FED. R. APP. 3(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); Ammons v. Gerlinger, 547 F.3d 724, 72526 (7th Cir. 2008); Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 858-59 (7th Cir. 1999); Lucien v. Jockish, 133 F.3d 464, 467 (7th Cir. 1998). If the appeal is found to be non-meritorious, Plaintiff may also incur another “strike.” A timely motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) may toll the 30-day appeal deadline.1 FED. R. APP. 4(a)(4). The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 26, 2017 s/J. Phil Gilbert U.S. District Judge 1 A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment. FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?