Maxum Indemnity Company v. R.M.F.S. Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER, The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice; R.M.F.S., Inc.'s counterclaim (Doc. 19) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and Randall Myers's counterclaim (Doc. 20) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/16/2017. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-00297-JPG-SCW R.M.F.S. INC., RANDALL MYERS, and DEANNA MORRIS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ joint motion for an order of dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 34) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows dismissal of an action without a court order by filing a stipulation signed by all parties that have appeared in the case. The parties have filed such a document here. Therefore, the Court finds that:  The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice;  R.M.F.S., Inc.’s counterclaim (Doc. 19) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and  Randall Myers’s counterclaim (Doc. 20) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: NOVEMBER 16, 2017 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?