Sultan v. Duncan et al

Filing 228

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 9/14/2021. (spl)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00418-MAB Document 228 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #1970 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CHARLES SULTAN, Plaintiff, vs. STEPHEN DUNCAN, ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-CV-00418-MAB JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE DECISION BY COURT. This matter having come before the Court, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Amended Complaint, filed on September 25, 2017, Defendants W. Byford, C/O Johnson, E. Clary, Harris, dallis, Wheeler, Taylor, RN Welty, C/O Hough, C/O Hance, and Molenhouer were TERMINATED (Doc. 11). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order entered on October 2, 2017, Defendant I/M R. Esther was DISMISSED with prejudice (Doc. 13). Defendants Officer Hough, I/A Hance, B.W. Vaughn, C/O Cooper, W. Bayler, LPN Welty, and I/A Molenhouer were DISMISSED without prejudice. Id. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order entered on February 11, 2020, Defendant Patricia Potts was DISMISSED without prejudice (Doc. 166). Page 1 of 2 Case 3:17-cv-00418-MAB Document 228 Filed 09/14/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #1971 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order dated September 14, 2021, the remaining claims against Defendants Stephen Duncan, Lisa Tarr, Brian Keller, Zachary Maxey, Robert Weaver, Christopher Gipson, Darrell Shelby, Chad Jennings, Jason Freeman, William Byford, Kevin T. Johnson, Ethan Clary, Don Harris, Allan Dallon, and Nathan Wheeler were DISMISSED with prejudice (Doc. 227). This action as a whole was DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). DATED: September 14, 2021 MARGARET M. ROBERTIE, Clerk of Court BY: /s/ Jennifer Jones Deputy Clerk APPROVED: /s/ Mark A. Beatty MARK A. BEATTY United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?