Sultan v. Duncan et al
Filing
228
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 9/14/2021. (spl)
Case 3:17-cv-00418-MAB Document 228 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #1970
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
CHARLES SULTAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STEPHEN DUNCAN, ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:17-CV-00418-MAB
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
DECISION BY COURT.
This matter having come before the Court, and the Court having rendered a
decision,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Amended Complaint,
filed on September 25, 2017, Defendants W. Byford, C/O Johnson, E. Clary, Harris, dallis,
Wheeler, Taylor, RN Welty, C/O Hough, C/O Hance, and Molenhouer were
TERMINATED (Doc. 11).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order
entered on October 2, 2017, Defendant I/M R. Esther was DISMISSED with prejudice
(Doc. 13). Defendants Officer Hough, I/A Hance, B.W. Vaughn, C/O Cooper, W. Bayler,
LPN Welty, and I/A Molenhouer were DISMISSED without prejudice. Id.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order
entered on February 11, 2020, Defendant Patricia Potts was DISMISSED without
prejudice (Doc. 166).
Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00418-MAB Document 228 Filed 09/14/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #1971
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order dated
September 14, 2021, the remaining claims against Defendants Stephen Duncan, Lisa Tarr,
Brian Keller, Zachary Maxey, Robert Weaver, Christopher Gipson, Darrell Shelby, Chad
Jennings, Jason Freeman, William Byford, Kevin T. Johnson, Ethan Clary, Don Harris,
Allan Dallon, and Nathan Wheeler were DISMISSED with prejudice (Doc. 227). This
action as a whole was DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 25(a)(1).
DATED: September 14, 2021
MARGARET M. ROBERTIE,
Clerk of Court
BY: /s/ Jennifer Jones
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED: /s/ Mark A. Beatty
MARK A. BEATTY
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?