Jackson v. Stolworthy et al

Filing 56

ORDER dismissing John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment at the close of the case. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 5/18/2018. (klh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS STEVIE JACKSON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 17-420-DRH-SCW MR. MUELLER, MR. DONALD CONRAD, MR. JACK R. BAILEY, MR. QUARRIE, MR. DALGADO, LT. STEPHEN JOHNSON, MR. FOREMAN, MR. BRIAN KAULING, KENDRA R. CAMPBELL, MR. MARC A. BURTON, MR. MARC AARON, MR. JASON ROBINSON, MR. BART TOENNIES, MR. TERRY GOODEN, JOHN DOE #2, and JOHN DOE #3, Defendants. ORDER Herndon, District Judge: On September 18, 2017, District Judge David R. Herndon completed his initial review of Plaintiff Jackson’s civil rights complaint (Doc. 1). In that Order, the Court advised Jackson that service would not be made on Defendants John Doe #2 and John Doe #3, until such time as Plaintiff has identified them by name on a properly filed amended complaint (Doc. 20, p. 41). On December 19, 2017 Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams entered a Trial Practice Schedule giving Plaintiff Jackson 90 days to identify Defendants John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 (Doc. 40, p. 3). The Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to properly prosecute as to Defendants John Doe #2 and John Doe #3. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES Defendants John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b). Remaining in this case are Plaintiff’s claims again Defendants Mr. Mueller, Mr. Donald Conrad, Mr.Jack R. Bailey, Mr. Quarrie, Mr. Delgado, Lt. Stephen Johnson, Mr. Foreman, Mr. Brian Kauling, Kendra R. Campbell, Mr. Marc A. Burton, Mr. Marc Aaron, Mr. Jason Robinson, Mr. Bart Toennies, and Mr. Terry Gooden. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Herndon 2018.05.18 13:17:45 -05'00' United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?