Woodard v. Casey et al

Filing 85

ORDER granting 82 Motion for Out of Pocket Expenses. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/8/2020. (dsw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BILLY RAY WOODARD, #N87909, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-687-DWD DR. CASEY, et al., Defendants. ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the motion for out-of-pocket expenses (Doc. 82) filed by Attorney John R. Clemons. Attorney Clemons seeks reimbursement of $950.161 in expenses. The Plan for Administration of the District Court Fund Section 2.6 authorizes any District or Magistrate Judge to approve a request for up to $5,000 via signed Order. Here, the undersigned finds the expenses to be reasonable and thus GRANTS the motion (Doc. 82). Pursuant to the Plan for the Administration of the District Court Fund, the The Court notes that Mr. Clemons initially seeks reimbursement in the amount of $950.16 (Doc. 82, p. 1). At the conclusion of his pleading, however, Mr. Clemons seeks reimbursement in the amount of $964.96 (Doc. 82, p. 2). The latter appears to be a typographical error. The receipts attached to the pleading support Mr. Clemons request for reimbursement in the amount of $950.16. 1 Page 1 of 2 Clerk of Court is ORDERED to pay Attorney John R. Clemons in the amount of nine hundred fifty dollars, and sixteen cents ($950.16), representing the out-of-pocket expenses reasonably incurred to date in this case by Plaintiff’s court-assigned counsel. The Court advises Mr. Clemons that, if this matter proceeds and Mr. Clemons seeks additional reimbursement for expenses associated with trial, no more than $5000.00 in out-of-pocket expenses may be reimbursed. Finally, the Court thanks Mr. Clemons for his service to date in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 8, 2020 DAVID W. DUGAN United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?