Althoff v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 31

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 10/5/2018. (jmt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CRAIG S. ALTHOFF, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER of SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil No. 17-cv-694-JPG-CJP ORDER for ATTORNEY’S FEES PROUD, Magistrate Judge: Before the Court is Defendant’s Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees and Expenses. (Doc. 26). The parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $4,635.27. The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable and appropriate. Per the parties’ agreement, this award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees and expenses (but not costs) that may have been payable to plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendant’s Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees and Expenses (Doc. 26) is 1 GRANTED. The Court awards plaintiff Craig S. Althoff the sum of $4,635.27 (four thousand six hundred and thirty-five dollars and twenty-seven cents) for attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. These funds shall be payable to plaintiff, per Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). However, in accordance with the parties’ agreement, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay plaintiff’s pre-existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment previously executed by plaintiff and counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: October 5, 2018. s/ Clifford J. Proud CLIFFORD J. PROUD U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?