Southard v. Wexford Medical et al

Filing 61

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 56) and DENIES Southard's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 28). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/1/2018. (jdh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
BENNY T. SOUTHARD,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00839-JPG-RJD

WEXFORD MEDICAL and DR. SHAW,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendations (“Report”)
(ECF No. 56) of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly with regard to the plaintiff’s motion for a
preliminary injunction (ECF No. 28). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in
part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation.
FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which
objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge
reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999).
Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the
entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 56); and



DENIES Southard’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 28).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: AUGUST 1, 2018
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE